Yes, I wrote about this in my only YT that got taken down: How to Lie with Statistics. I later put it on Rumble and then did a new prologue and included it in Digging Into the Data: https://youtu.be/CsA5cf04t40. In short, there are two different things you're testing for: safe and effective. If your 'vaccine' is only effective two weeks later, adding them at that time for comparison makes sense. But for safety, the closer a death or hospitalization is to the injection, the more likely they're correlated. So the first two weeks are the most crucial time to gather information.
In an honest study, designed by a first-year stats student, the two-weeks vaxxed would be their own group in a moving window. Of course, all-cause mortality, hospitalizations and doctor visits would be tracked throughout.
Mathew Crawford picked up on another level of deception that the numerators of 2-week deaths were put over denominators that were much smaller and not adjusted, which I think is what you're referring to. But we all know this wasn't a mistake.
I will save this to read soon, but... I got a destructive virus in my COMPUTER, so from the library, I'm just letting you know that I'm unsubscribing until I can get it all figured out, and then I'll re-subscribe. (Tooo much email!)
Yes. When I first digested what they were doing, it was hard to control my disbelief. How the stupid masses bought into it just showed me that "thinning the herd" may not be such a bad idea.
Yes, I wrote about this in my only YT that got taken down: How to Lie with Statistics. I later put it on Rumble and then did a new prologue and included it in Digging Into the Data: https://youtu.be/CsA5cf04t40. In short, there are two different things you're testing for: safe and effective. If your 'vaccine' is only effective two weeks later, adding them at that time for comparison makes sense. But for safety, the closer a death or hospitalization is to the injection, the more likely they're correlated. So the first two weeks are the most crucial time to gather information.
In an honest study, designed by a first-year stats student, the two-weeks vaxxed would be their own group in a moving window. Of course, all-cause mortality, hospitalizations and doctor visits would be tracked throughout.
Mathew Crawford picked up on another level of deception that the numerators of 2-week deaths were put over denominators that were much smaller and not adjusted, which I think is what you're referring to. But we all know this wasn't a mistake.
Great pic.
I will save this to read soon, but... I got a destructive virus in my COMPUTER, so from the library, I'm just letting you know that I'm unsubscribing until I can get it all figured out, and then I'll re-subscribe. (Tooo much email!)
Cheers. I'll be back!
100% malevolent!!
Yes. When I first digested what they were doing, it was hard to control my disbelief. How the stupid masses bought into it just showed me that "thinning the herd" may not be such a bad idea.